Page 1 of 13
Theme 1K
Learning from the Spelling of < love >
Summary
Ability to spell and to understanding the reasons for spellings is a mode of thinking; orthography is cognitive and every engagement with it is a thinking activity. Real spellers know that uninformed mechanical ‘correctness’ has no equivalence with understanding; we learn from words whose spelling we already know because they are a rich and productive source of evidence for determining how the system really works.
This theme explains:
- that there is much to learn from single words even when we are quite sure how to write them;
- that complete English words do not have final < v >;
- that < uv > is not an allowable letter sequence in English words — < ov > is used instead;
- that only suffixes that have an initial vowel letter replace a final single non-syllabic < e >.
The orthographic content of this site is copyright ©1999-2024 by Real Spelling and Pascal Mira. All rights reserved. Permission to publish their content was granted by Real Spelling to M. Berman in 2019. The content required for the website's operation is copyright ©2019-2024 by M. Berman, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except for use by the subscriber's children or classes, without the prior written permission of the publisher or in accordance with the Copyright, Design, and Patents Act 1988. The material on this site is for the exclusive use of the subscribers to the site, and their children and students. Copyright holders are not responsible for your misuse of the English language nor any damages ensuing from that misuse.